BEGIN:VCALENDAR
VERSION:2.0
PRODID:-//CREST - ECPv5.1.3//NONSGML v1.0//EN
CALSCALE:GREGORIAN
METHOD:PUBLISH
X-WR-CALNAME:CREST
X-ORIGINAL-URL:https://crest.science
X-WR-CALDESC:Events for CREST
BEGIN:VTIMEZONE
TZID:Europe/Helsinki
BEGIN:DAYLIGHT
TZOFFSETFROM:+0200
TZOFFSETTO:+0300
TZNAME:EEST
DTSTART:20230326T010000
END:DAYLIGHT
BEGIN:STANDARD
TZOFFSETFROM:+0300
TZOFFSETTO:+0200
TZNAME:EET
DTSTART:20231029T010000
END:STANDARD
END:VTIMEZONE
BEGIN:VEVENT
DTSTART;TZID=Europe/Helsinki:20230928T110000
DTEND;TZID=Europe/Helsinki:20230928T123000
DTSTAMP:20260723T153300
CREATED:20230829T053415Z
LAST-MODIFIED:20230918T120531Z
UID:15367-1695898800-1695904200@crest.science
SUMMARY:Luca Taschini (University of Edinburgh and LSE) " Nailing Down Volatile Temperatures: Examining Their Effects on Asset Prices"
DESCRIPTION:Quantitative Sustainable Economics and Finance\nTime: 11.00 am\nDate: 28th of September 2023\nRoom 2036 \nLuca Taschini (University of Edinburgh and LSE) ” Nailing Down Volatile Temperatures: Examining Their Effects on Asset Prices” \nAbstract : We present a statistic to generally represent extremes in the distribution of temperature anomalies and demonstrate its consequences on financial markets. The diverse shocks that our measure portrays are established to be primary drivers of electricity consumption and the weather futures market. We find that this metric is a significant factor in the cross-section of equity returns in specific industries. A spatial hedging strategy is developed to account for differentially exposed firms to temperature extremes\, resulting in a large market-adjusted alpha for the least vulnerable firms. We end by explicitly investigating whether the price reaction to extreme temperatures results from firm operations or investor attention. In each step of our exercise\, we contrast our measure with average temperature anomalies and demonstrate that our metric is the first-order feature. \n\nOrganizers:\n\nPeter TANKOV (CREST) – Olivier David ZERBIB (CREST) \n  \nSponsors:\nCREST \n
URL:https://crest.science/event/luca-taschini-university-of-edinburgh-and-lse-nailing-down-volatile-temperatures-examining-their-effects-on-asset-prices/
CATEGORIES:Finance-Insurance,Quantitative Sustainable Economics and Finance
ATTACH;FMTTYPE=:
END:VEVENT
BEGIN:VEVENT
DTSTART;TZID=Europe/Helsinki:20230928T120000
DTEND;TZID=Europe/Helsinki:20230928T133000
DTSTAMP:20260723T153300
CREATED:20230721T105044Z
LAST-MODIFIED:20230913T120458Z
UID:15268-1695902400-1695907800@crest.science
SUMMARY:Gabriel Abend (Université de Lucerne) - Words and Distinctions for the Common Good
DESCRIPTION:Sociology seminar – Thursdays\nTime: 12:00 pm – 1:30 pm \nDate: 28th September 2023\nPlace: room 3105 \nZOOM : https://zoom.us/j/95438122710?pwd=MUFrR2d3U0xSaE93OFlXNlFvTVcrZz09 \n  \nGabriel Abend (Université de Lucerne) – Words and Distinctions for the Common Good\nAbstract: \nSocial scientists do research on a variety of topics—gender\, capitalism\, populism\, and race and ethnicity\, among others. They make descriptive and explanatory claims about empathy\, intelligence\, neoliberalism\, and power. They advise policymakers on diversity\, digitalization\, work\, and religion. And yet\, as Gabriel Abend points out in this provocative book\, they can’t agree on what these things are and how to identify them. How to tell if something is a religion or a cult or a sect? What is empathy? What makes this society a capitalist one? Disputes of this sort arise again and again in the social sciences. Abend argues that these disagreements have been doubly misconceived. First\, they conflate two questions: how a social science community should use its most important words\, and what distinctions it should accept and work with. Second\, there’s no fact of the matter about either. Instead\, they’re practical reason questions for a community\, which aim at epistemically and morally good outcomes. Abend calls on social science communities to work together on their words\, distinctions\, and classifications. They must make collective decisions about the uses of words\, the acceptability of distinctions\, and the criteria for assessing both. These decisions aren’t up to individual scholars; the community gets the last word. According to Abend\, the common good\, justice\, and equality should play a significant role in the logic of scientific research. \n  \nOrganizers: Annina Cleasson\, Etienne Ollion\, Patrick Präg (CREST Sociology unit) \n  \nSponsors: CREST \n  \n
URL:https://crest.science/event/gabriel-abend-universite-de-lucerne-words-and-distinctions-for-the-common-good/
CATEGORIES:Sociology
ATTACH;FMTTYPE=:
END:VEVENT
END:VCALENDAR