BEGIN:VCALENDAR
VERSION:2.0
PRODID:-//CREST - ECPv5.1.3//NONSGML v1.0//EN
CALSCALE:GREGORIAN
METHOD:PUBLISH
X-WR-CALNAME:CREST
X-ORIGINAL-URL:https://crest.science
X-WR-CALDESC:Events for CREST
BEGIN:VTIMEZONE
TZID:Europe/Helsinki
BEGIN:DAYLIGHT
TZOFFSETFROM:+0200
TZOFFSETTO:+0300
TZNAME:EEST
DTSTART:20260329T010000
END:DAYLIGHT
BEGIN:STANDARD
TZOFFSETFROM:+0300
TZOFFSETTO:+0200
TZNAME:EET
DTSTART:20261025T010000
END:STANDARD
END:VTIMEZONE
BEGIN:VEVENT
DTSTART;TZID=Europe/Helsinki:20260114T000000
DTEND;TZID=Europe/Helsinki:20260114T133000
DTSTAMP:20260709T225003
CREATED:20251229T135214Z
LAST-MODIFIED:20260113T074857Z
UID:18676-1768348800-1768397400@crest.science
SUMMARY:Sijie LIN  (University of Toronto) "Learning to Prompt: Human Adaptation in Production with Generative AI”"
DESCRIPTION:[vc_row][vc_column][vc_column_text]Macro seminar\nTime : 12h15- 13h30\nDate : 14 th  January 2026 \nSalle 3001 \nSijie LIN (University of Toronto)”Learning to Prompt: Human Adaptation in Production with Generative AI” \nAbstract: What is the role of human input in AI-assisted production? Humans interact with generative AI through combinations of words called prompts. A key feature of human input is adaptation: users dynamically modify their prompts based on their understanding of AI. I empirically investigate two types of adaptation: (1) adaptation to new AI versions\, referring to how people change their prompts in response to AI upgrades; (2) adaptation to outputs from previous prompts\, referring to how people adjust their prompts iteratively to converge on desired outcomes. I study this adaptation using prompt-level data from Midjourney\, a leading AI image generator. First\, users adapt to AI upgrades by writing different words in their prompts. By submitting prompts written for the old version to the new AI and vice versa\, I decompose the output shifts as arising from prompt changes (73%)\, AI changes (20%)\, and a residual (7%)\, implying complementarity between AI and human inputs. Second\, prompts evolve within the creative process of an artwork. I estimate a structural model of the creative process using the sequential search framework. Counterfactual shows that without human adaptation\, users need three times more prompts to achieve data-observed results. Both results highlight the importance of human judgment and adaptation in the creative process. \n  \n  \n
URL:https://crest.science/event/sijie-lin-university-of-toronto-t-b-a/
CATEGORIES:Macroeconomics,Seminars
ATTACH;FMTTYPE=:
END:VEVENT
END:VCALENDAR