BEGIN:VCALENDAR
VERSION:2.0
PRODID:-//CREST - ECPv5.1.3//NONSGML v1.0//EN
CALSCALE:GREGORIAN
METHOD:PUBLISH
X-WR-CALNAME:CREST
X-ORIGINAL-URL:https://crest.science
X-WR-CALDESC:Events for CREST
BEGIN:VTIMEZONE
TZID:Europe/Paris
BEGIN:DAYLIGHT
TZOFFSETFROM:+0100
TZOFFSETTO:+0200
TZNAME:CEST
DTSTART:20180325T010000
END:DAYLIGHT
BEGIN:STANDARD
TZOFFSETFROM:+0200
TZOFFSETTO:+0100
TZNAME:CET
DTSTART:20181028T010000
END:STANDARD
END:VTIMEZONE
BEGIN:VEVENT
DTSTART;TZID=Europe/Paris:20181030T121500
DTEND;TZID=Europe/Paris:20181030T133000
DTSTAMP:20260713T134640
CREATED:20181022T093926Z
LAST-MODIFIED:20181022T093926Z
UID:12141-1540901700-1540906200@crest.science
SUMMARY:Enrique FATAS (Loughborough University & University of Pennsylvania) - “Democracy fights in darkness"
DESCRIPTION:\nExperimental Economics Seminar:\nTime: 12:15 pm – 1:30 pm\nDate: 30th of October 2018\nPlace: Room 3001.\nEnrique FATAS (Loughborough University & University of Pennsylvania) – “Democracy fights in darkness”\, joint work with Jordi Brandts (Instituto de Analysis Economico & Barcelona Graduate School of Economics)\, Catherine Eckel (Texas A&M University)\, and Shaun Hargreaves Heap (King’s College London). \nAbstract: It is an empirical regularity that democratic countries go to war with each other less than pairs of dictatorships (the so called dyadic interaction). The question is whether this relation is causal: do democracies make wars less likely? In Experiment 1\, we study potential causal mechanisms: voting accountability and the emergence of norms of peaceful conflict resolution. Democratic or dictatorial conditions are first exogenously imposed on distinct groups of participants. Groups are then paired\, and play a Tullock conflict game with each other. Our measure of a group’s bellicosity is their investment in this conflict\, decided by voters (the dictator) in democratic (non-democratic) regimes. As in a final stage\, participants decide how much to contribute to a public good from the resources not invested in conflict. We find no evidence of either causal mechanism linking democracies to peace\, as democracies fight other democracies are significantly more bellicose than non-democratic regimes. Similar results are obtained when we repeat the analysis for asymmetric interactions of democratic and non-democratic regimes in Experiment 2 (the monadic interaction. In Experiments 3 and 4\, we expand our definition of democratic institutions by adding a deliberation stage\, giving full freedom of expression to all participants (in both democratic and non-democratic regimes). While deliberation dramatically reduces bellicosity (and increases contributions to the public good) in democratic regimes\, it significantly increases investment in conflict in inclusive dictatorships. \n\n\nOrganizers:\nGuillaume Hollard (CREST) & Anett John (CREST)\nSponsors:\nCREST\nLunch registration:\nfood provided\, no registration\n\n
URL:https://crest.science/event/enrique-fatas-loughborough-pennsylvania-universities-democracy-fights-in-darkness/
CATEGORIES:Economics
ATTACH;FMTTYPE=:
END:VEVENT
END:VCALENDAR